Criminal Law Reform
Featured
Arizona
Oct 2023
Criminal Law Reform
Racial Justice
Fund for Empowerment v. Phoenix, City of
Fund for Empowerment is a challenge to the City of Phoenix鈥檚 practice of conducting sweeps of encampments without notice, issuing citations to unsheltered people for camping and sleeping on public property when they have no place else to go, and confiscating and destroying their property without notice or process.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2023
Criminal Law Reform
McElrath v. Georgia
Does the Double Jeopardy Clause bar an appellate court from reviewing and setting aside a jury鈥檚 verdicts of acquittal on the ground that the verdict is inconsistent with the jury鈥檚 verdict on other charges?
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2023
Criminal Law Reform
Pulsifer v. United States
This case involves the interpretation of a federal law that allows defendants to avoid mandatory minimum sentences for certain nonviolent drug crimes, allowing judges to impose sentences tailored to their individual circumstances.
Texas
Jul 2021
Criminal Law Reform
Prisoners' Rights
Sanchez et al v. Dallas County Sheriff et al
Decarceration has always been an emergency, a life and death proposition, but COVID-19 makes this effort intensely urgent. The 网红爆料 has been working with our partners to litigate for the rights of those who are incarcerated and cannot protect themselves because of the policies of the institutions in which they are jailed.
All Cases
146 Criminal Law Reform Cases
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2013
Criminal Law Reform
Smart Justice
Salinas v. Texas
Whether the Fifth Amendment prohibits the prosecution from commenting at trial on a defendant鈥檚 silence when questioned by the police prior to Miranda warnings.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2013
Criminal Law Reform
Smart Justice
Salinas v. Texas
Whether the Fifth Amendment prohibits the prosecution from commenting at trial on a defendant鈥檚 silence when questioned by the police prior to Miranda warnings.
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2012
Criminal Law Reform
Smart Justice
Alleyne v. United States
Whether the quantity of drugs involved in a crime must be decided by the jury before it can be the basis for a mandatory minimum sentence.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2012
Criminal Law Reform
Smart Justice
Alleyne v. United States
Whether the quantity of drugs involved in a crime must be decided by the jury before it can be the basis for a mandatory minimum sentence.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2012
Criminal Law Reform
Florida v. Harris
Whether the police may conduct a warrantless search for drugs based solely on an alert by a drug-sniffing dog without any other evidence of the dog's reliability so long as the dog has been "trained" or "certified."
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2012
Criminal Law Reform
Florida v. Harris
Whether the police may conduct a warrantless search for drugs based solely on an alert by a drug-sniffing dog without any other evidence of the dog's reliability so long as the dog has been "trained" or "certified."
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2012
Criminal Law Reform
Bailey v. United States
Whether someone who has left the immediate vicinity of a house that is about to be searched may be seized by the police without probable cause.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2012
Criminal Law Reform
Bailey v. United States
Whether someone who has left the immediate vicinity of a house that is about to be searched may be seized by the police without probable cause.
Court Case
Mar 2012
Criminal Law Reform
Smart Justice
Barnes v. Camden
In July 2010, the 网红爆料 and the 网红爆料 of New Jersey filed a lawsuit on behalf of an innocent Camden, New Jersey man, Joel Barnes, who was jailed for more than a year as the result of having drugs planted on him by police officers later implicated in a large-scale evidence-planting conspiracy affecting nearly 200 other Camden residents. Mr. Barnes is seeking compensatory damages, as well as injunctive relief designed to prevent such conduct among Camden police officers from occurring in the future.
Explore case
Court Case
Mar 2012
Criminal Law Reform
Smart Justice
Barnes v. Camden
In July 2010, the 网红爆料 and the 网红爆料 of New Jersey filed a lawsuit on behalf of an innocent Camden, New Jersey man, Joel Barnes, who was jailed for more than a year as the result of having drugs planted on him by police officers later implicated in a large-scale evidence-planting conspiracy affecting nearly 200 other Camden residents. Mr. Barnes is seeking compensatory damages, as well as injunctive relief designed to prevent such conduct among Camden police officers from occurring in the future.