TALLAHASSEE, Fla. ā A Florida court indicated today that it would issue an order blocking the stateās 15-week ban on abortion. The law ā which is scheduled to take effect tomorrow, July 1 ā prevents people from getting an abortion and threatens to imprison doctors for providing necessary care for their patients. The law is likely to go into effect for a short time while the court prepares the written order, but the court made clear today that the law will be enjoined shortly. Plaintiffs will also seek to quickly vacate any stay that is imposed upon an appeal from the state.
Two-thirds of Floridians the right to abortion, and voters have consistently cast their ballots to ensure that the state constitution provides independent protection for the right to abortion. House Bill 5 (HB 5) is under the state constitution. In 1980, Florida voters amended the state constitution to provide broad protections for individual privacy rights ā including abortion. And in 2012, voters overwhelmingly rejected Amendment 6, which would have taken those protections away. While the U.S. Supreme Courtās shameful ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Womenās Health Organization took away the federal constitutional right to abortion, the Florida Constitution provides broad, independent protections for abortion. These protections, which have been repeatedly affirmed by Florida voters and decades of legal precedents, continue to protect Floridiansā fundamental right to abortion.
Floridians already face burdensome restrictions to getting an abortion ā such as a ban on insurance plans on the state exchange covering abortion; a parental consent requirement that makes it harder for young people to get abortions; and a law that took effect in April that requires people to make an additional, unnecessary trip to an abortion provider before receiving care. There are also many other barriers to access for people who need abortion care, including delays in finding out theyāre pregnant, difficulty affording essential health care, and a lack of nearby providers.
HB 5 would force Floridians to remain pregnant against their will, violating their dignity and bodily autonomy, and endangering their families, their health, and even their . The impacts of pushing reproductive health care out of reach in the middle of a maternal mortality crisis will fall hardest on Black women, who are nearly more likely than white women to die during childbirth, or shortly after.
Below are statements from plaintiffs and litigators:
āWeāre glad the court recognized Floridaās abortion ban is a cruel attack on peopleās health, futures, and state constitutional rights,ā said Whitney White, staff attorney, Ķųŗģ±¬ĮĻ Reproductive Freedom Project. āFloridaās 15-week ban would force people to carry pregnancies against their will, risking their health and depriving them of the right to make deeply personal decisions about the course of their own lives. This ban defies the will of the people and rights that Floridians have relied on for decades. Everyone deserves the ability to access the abortion care they need and weāll continue fighting for that right with every tool at our disposal.ā
āIn the wake of a cataclysmic Supreme Court ruling overturning Roe v. Wade, it is more critical than ever to protect abortion access in Florida,ā said Caroline Sacerdote, staff attorney, Center for Reproductive Rights. āAs the Florida Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized, the Florida constitution protects the right to abortion. The court has rightfully stood by that precedent today. The stateās 15-week ban is an insult to Floridians, the majority of whom have voiced their support time and time again for their right to make decisions about their own bodies and futures. We will continue to stand by Floridians to protect their health and lives. Everyone, everywhere should be able to access essential health care regardless of zip code.ā
āWhile Floridians may soon be able to breathe a sigh of relief, make no mistake, abortion access is in real peril in our state. Already, lawmakers have made it incredibly difficult for our patients to access the essential health care they need and for us to provide that care,ā said Kelly Flynn, president & CEO, A Womanās Choice clinics. āThere has been chaos and confusion among patients since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. We cannot let Florida turn the clock back. Our patients shouldnāt have to worry if and when they can access abortion care, and we will continue to fight to protect their health and lives.ā
āToday in Florida, there is a glimmer of hope for abortion access: once the Court enters its order, Floridians will continue to have access to care protected under their stateās constitution. Theyāll continue to be able to decide what is best for their own bodies, lives, and futures, without political interference,ā said Alexis McGill Johnson, president and CEO, Planned Parenthood Federation of America. āThis decision could not come at a more crucial time. As abortion bans ripple across the country, Floridians need to be able to access care at home ā and their neighbors need to be able to turn to Floridaās abortion providers as well. Planned Parenthood pledges to be there for anyone seeking an abortion in Florida, no matter what.ā
āWhile this is only a first step in fighting this dangerous abortion ban, we are grateful this court recognized that it is an unconstitutional intrusion on our patientsā and providersā medical decisions,ā said Stephanie Fraim, president and CEO, Planned Parenthood of Southwest and Central Florida. āOnce this ban is blocked, Florida abortion providers will be able to offer patients who decide to have an abortion the care they need here at home. Planned Parenthood of Southwest and Central Florida will continue to stand with all abortion providers and the patients who turn to them.ā
āAbortion bans have no place in Florida, and today, this court agreed that the 15-week ban has no place under the stateās constitution,ā said Alex Mandado, president and CEO, Planned Parenthood of South, East, and North Florida. āThis ban forces pregnant people to decide between the burden of traveling out-of-state for care at great financial and emotional expense or the risk of carrying a pregnancy to term even in dangerous circumstances. We are relieved that this ban will be blocked and that abortion providers will be able to keep offering compassionate, evidence-based medical care in the state of Florida.ā
āFloridians have shown time and again that they believe in the right to privacy,ā said Daniel Tilley, legal director of the Ķųŗģ±¬ĮĻ of Florida. āThe courtās decision reflects the will of the people and upholds Floridiansā constitutional right to privacy. Despite the efforts by Gov. Ron DeSantis and extremist Florida politicians, we have the power to fight back against these attempts to force their cruel agenda on Floridians. We will continue to do so to ensure no one is forced to carry a pregnancy against their will.ā
āWe are very pleased with the courtās decision to block Floridaās 15-week ban on abortions, which would have devasting consequences for individuals across the state,ā said Jenner & Block Partner April Otterberg. āToday, the court system stepped up to protect the rights that Floridians are guaranteed under their Constitution, and the decision, once it is entered in a written order, will clear the way for providers across Florida to continue to give the care that women choose for themselves, knowing what is best for their own bodies and their own unique futures. We look forward to continuing our work to advocate for all those who have a right to these essential health care services.ā
The Ķųŗģ±¬ĮĻ, Ķųŗģ±¬ĮĻ of Florida, Center for Reproductive Rights, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, and the law firm Jenner & Block filed this lawsuit on behalf of Planned Parenthood of Southwest and Central Florida; Planned Parenthood of South, East and North Florida; Gainesville Woman Care; Indian Rocks Womanās Center; St. Petersburg Womanās Health Center; Tampa Womanās Health Center; and A Womanās Choice of Jacksonville.
An overview of the case and the complaint can be found here: /cases/planned-parenthood-southwest-and-central-florida-et-al-v-state-florida-et-al
Reproductive Freedom
Planned Parenthood of Southwest and Central Florida, et al. v. State of Florida, et al.
Reproductive Freedom
Planned Parenthood of Southwest and Central Florida, et al. v. State of Florida, et al.
Learn More Ķųŗģ±¬ĮĻ the Issues in This Press Release
-
Press ReleaseJul 2025
Reproductive Freedom
Judge Issues Preliminary Injunctions Again Blocking Missouriās Abortion Bans, Some Restrictions. Explore Press Release.Judge Issues Preliminary Injunctions Again Blocking Missouriās Abortion Bans, Some Restrictions
Kansas City, Mo. ā A Jackson County circuit court judge issued a preliminary injunction blocking the enforcement of Missouriās abortion bans and several targeted regulations of abortion providers. The new preliminary injunction clears the way for Missouriās Planned Parenthood members to again provide procedural abortion care. In May, the Missouri Supreme Court clarified the stateās legal standard for issuing a preliminary injunction, forcing the circuit court to temporarily vacate its original orders, and effectively implement a de facto abortion ban. āWhile the clarification on the standard is welcome, its immediate consequence temporarily pulled back implementation of Missouriansā constitutional right to access abortion care and providersā right to offer that care,ā said Gillian Wilcox, Director of Litigation at the Ķųŗģ±¬ĮĻ of Missouri. āThis critical win begins to restore abortion access in our state, but Missourians must be vigilant and defeat the attacks on the constitutional rights that we secured at the ballot box last November.ā āAbortion is legal again in Missouri because voters demanded it and we fought for it,ā said Emily Wales, president and CEO, Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood Great Plains. āCare starts again on Monday in Kansas City. Weāre not stopping until every Missourian can get the care they need, close to home.ā āWe are grateful that procedural abortion can resume in the state of Missouri, just as voters demanded last November. However, the whiplash has created immense confusion for patients in Missouri,ā said Margot Riphagen, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Great Rivers. āThis decision is a step forward toward fully realizing Missourians' right to reproductive freedom, and the staff at our Central West End health center in St. Louis will work as quickly as possible to resume scheduling abortion appointments." The order did not address the pending request to enjoin other targeted restrictions that are preventing medication abortion access from being restored in Missouri. Previously, both Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood Great Plains and Planned Parenthood Great Rivers-Missouri submitted complication plans to satisfy the existing requirements to allow them to offer medication abortions. The Department of Health and Senior Services failed to respond to either affiliatesā submissions or follow-up inquiries for several weeks. Instead, the department manufactured an āemergency ruleā that resembled many of the court-blocked regulations and cited it as the reason for refusing the submitted plans. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood Great Plains and Planned Parenthood Great Rivers-Missouri, who are represented by attorneys from the Ķųŗģ±¬ĮĻ of Missouri, the Ķųŗģ±¬ĮĻ, Crowell & Moring, and Planned Parenthood Federation of America. The full case is currently slated for trial in January 2026. -
Press ReleaseJul 2025
Disability Rights
+2 Issues
Aclu Statement On Final Passage Of Massive Budget Bill Cutting Medicaid To Fund Abusive Deportation Efforts. Explore Press Release.Ķųŗģ±¬ĮĻ Statement on Final Passage of Massive Budget Bill Cutting Medicaid to Fund Abusive Deportation Efforts
WASHINGTON ā The U.S. House of Representatives today gave final approval to H.R. 1, a budget bill that guts Medicaid and will wreak havoc on our communities, sending it to President Trumpās desk for his signature. H.R. 1 is the biggest cut to Medicaid in history ā slashing approximately $1 trillion, which will result in at least 12 million people being removed from the program. The bill also cuts off access to Planned Parenthood services for Medicaid enrollees and restricts higher education opportunities, all to fund a dramatic and permanent increase to an immigration detention and deportation apparatus that denies due process and violates human rights. Following the vote in the House, Deirdre Schifeling, chief political and advocacy officer with the Ķųŗģ±¬ĮĻ, issued the following statement: āThis reckless monstrosity is the most harmful bill to pass Congress in a generation. Instead of strengthening Medicaid, theyāve taken an axe to it. Instead of reining in ICEās abuses, Congress is throwing the agency billions more to terrorize our communities. āWhen 12 million people are kicked off Medicaid, patients are no longer able to get lifesaving cancer screenings at Planned Parenthood, disabled people lose access to essential care and autonomy, and ICE ramps up lawless raids in our communities, the American people will remember who caused this devastation to our health, rights, and dignity. We wonāt let them forget.ā -
Press ReleaseJun 2025
Reproductive Freedom
Women's Rights
Aclu Responds To Supreme Court Greenlighting State Efforts To ādefundā Planned Parenthood. Explore Press Release.Ķųŗģ±¬ĮĻ Responds to Supreme Court Greenlighting State Efforts to āDefundā Planned Parenthood
WASHINGTON ā The Supreme Court ruled today that Medicaid patients do not have a right to sue to enforce their right to a qualified health care provider of choice under the Medicaid statute. The decision in Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic will facilitate some statesā politically motivated efforts to block low-income patientsā access to certain health care providers and may effectively defund Planned Parenthood and other disfavored providers by barring them from state Medicaid programs. āThe majority decision in Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic contradicts Congressās clear purpose to give Medicaid patients their choice of qualified health care providers and also wrongly curtails patientsā rights to vindicate their choice of provider through Section 1983,ā said Cecillia Wang, National Legal Director for the Ķųŗģ±¬ĮĻ. āThe decision may have the effect of blocking patientsā access to birth control, cancer screenings, and STI testing and treatment for patients in South Carolina and potentially will permit state officials to override patientsā choice of provider based on political whims.ā āThe impact of this decision on our reproductive freedom will be compounded if Congress follows through on federal efforts to 'defund' Planned Parenthood by prohibiting patients from choosing Planned Parenthood health centers for their care,ā said Deirdre Schifeling, Chief Political and Advocacy Officer of the Ķųŗģ±¬ĮĻ. āDoing so would force the closure of hundreds of Planned Parenthood health centers nationwide, robbing people of their freedom to get reproductive health care from trusted providers in their communities and would result in shuttering 1 in 4 of the countryās abortion providers. "Make no mistake: our reproductive freedom is still under siege. The Ķųŗģ±¬ĮĻ remains committed to fighting for Planned Parenthood, abortion access, and the fundamental human right to control oneās own body using every tool we have. -
Press ReleaseJun 2025
Reproductive Freedom
Aclu Joins 100+ Abortion Storytellers On Capitol Hill In Advocating For Reproductive FreedomĀ . Explore Press Release.Ķųŗģ±¬ĮĻ Joins 100+ Abortion Storytellers on Capitol Hill in Advocating for Reproductive FreedomĀ
WASHINGTON ā The Ķųŗģ±¬ĮĻ joined more than 100 abortion storytellers on Capitol Hill today to demand that lawmakers defend the reproductive freedom of people across the country against escalating attacks in Congress and by the Trump administration. The education day, organized by Abortion Access Now (AAN) and Free & Just, brought the largest storyteller convening for abortion rights to the Hill since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade three years ago. Abortion patients, providers, and advocates held over 100 meetings with members of Congress on both sides of the aisle, speaking directly to lawmakers about the human toll of abortion bans: delayed medical care, severe health complications, and even the loss of womenās lives. As part of the education day on the Hill, Ķųŗģ±¬ĮĻ Chief Political and Advocacy Officer Deirdre Schifeling, shared the following remarks at an event with lawmakers. āThree years on from the Dobbs decision, reproductive freedom and our right to bodily autonomy are still under siege. The attacks are not coming in the most obvious or direct way, a national abortion ban passed by Congress, because they know the American people wonāt stand for it. Instead, itās a ādeath by many cutsā strategy designed by anti-abortion politicians to eliminate access nationwide, even in states where care is protected. āRight now, Congress is considering ādefundingā Planned Parenthood by blocking Medicaid patients from using their insurance there, which would shutter 1 in 4 of the countryās abortion providers. The FDA is using junk science to justify making medication abortion harder for patients to get even where it is legal. And the Trump administration continues to make reckless decisions that create chaos and confusion for patients seeking emergency care and their health care providers across the country. āOur communities need congressional leaders to hold the Trump administration accountable, and to act with the urgency that this moment requires to protect our reproductive freedom.ā